-
Heckel’s Horse Jr. Green G’s
Acrylic on handcut paper, PVA glued to cardboard.
-
Also see my exhibition, Starmer Farmer Harmer at Black Ivory in Muswell Hill, London.
Buy the placards in my Etsy shop at: https://www.etsy.com/uk/listing/1881218608/starmer-farmer-harmer-placard-ready-to
Protest 2, 11th December 2024:
To have well functioning family farms, there needs to be recognition in tax law of the huge amount of land, work and capital investment they take to run, per £1 each farmer gets in the pocket. Especially regarding inheritance tax, which, under Labour’s new plans, will mean impossible payment conditions for the family farm to meet, without selling off all, or a large chunk of their existing business. Moving towards one-size-fits-all inheritance tax, when one size clearly doesn’t, makes no sense to me and punishes valuable contributors to our country, completely unnecessarily. Starmer’s Labour (the self-declared “Party for working people” who made a big fuss about looking after farmers and recognising their needs, in the run up to the general election) are planning to reverse existing recognition family farms have regarding this. I think this is a catastrophically bad idea, and will have terrible consequences, not just for UK family farms, but for the UK in general. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.
I’m officially claiming “Starmer Farmer Harmer”. I thought the slogan up on the bus last month and used it for my placard at the first demo, see “Protest 1” section below. Didn’t see my slogan anywhere at the first demo, other than on my placard. Now, at the second demo, it’s everywhere. Although some had re-ordered the words. Cheekier still, how about adding a “the” and selling it on Etsy?. Do I get commission? Even saw my exact slogan on the front of two of the tractors. When I took the same placard as I had at the first demo to the second one, today, this time, it had the “Starmer Farmer Harmer” written on both sides. Instantly double your audience. Probably doubled my copycats for the next demo. Maybe I should say “suspected plagiarism”, like I did Delaine Le Bas. Different story. Spoke to the Evening Standard:

A photographer took this photo when I was sat outside the Houses of Parliament several hours too early for the demo. Thought I might as well display the sign for the passing traffic. Ended up in the Mail Online. As did this one.
Protest 1, November 2024:
This posts discussion caught fire on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/1gwbtcb/comment/ly8aon5/
Yesterday I went to the farmers’ protest in Whitehall, London against the changes to inheritance tax, which I see as an attack on some of the most hardworking, underpaid, undervalued people in our country. Why make it difficult for family farms to pass down their profession to the next generation?
Drop the family farm tax. Save family farms from Starmer the farmer harmer.
My main sign read “STARMER FARMER HARMER”. I put it up against the railings at Downing Street, outside Westminster tube and at the foot of Churchill’s statue near the Houses of Parliament. I also took another crap A4 sign that was too small, confusing, and factually inaccurate that had Starmer going after the farmers like Thatcher (as much as Wilson?) went after the miners.
The idea that having a farm worth over a few million in land value and assets defines them as “rich” is rubbish. The farmers don’t see that cash. Where are they going to get the money from to keep running? They’re using their land, time and assets to work for less than minimum wage to put food on our shelves. To get a loan and pay back, even over decades is just another blow to grafters struggling to survive as it is. Assuming they’d even get a loan. A few Labour drones were on TV last night trying to justify it. One even said that if people were told only 500 odd farms would be affected, the public wouldn’t care. More rubbish. I’m no farmer, but I’d care if this was happening to just one farm, let alone 500.
Another Labour MP said non-farmers would be unsympathetic to the farmers because we pay up to 40%. Again, not true. I’m no farmer, but I’d happily see farmers pay 0% and me 40% because, unlike them, I’m not getting up at the crack of dawn to work myself into the ground so that the rest of the country can eat. This is what these MP’s expect us to believe? They think we can’t see through their nonsense.
Starmer was all over the farmers in the run up to the election. All this talk of saying they wouldn’t be raising taxes and would be looking after the “workers”. All this talk about everything being “fully costed”. If it was fully costed, where was it in Labour’s pre-election manifesto? With the pensioner winter fuel cuts, early prison releases, Chagos Islands and Twitter policing? Anything else they forgot to mention?
Who works harder than farmers? If farmers aren’t the “workers”, who is? And now Starmer’s in, off he goes after them and their livelihoods. Their kids’ livelihoods. Their way of life. Making out now it’s to help the NHS. Funny how with politicians, it’s always to fund the NHS and not the wars, private consultants, and whatever other HS2ey vanity projects they like tying us up in. Tories and Labour are done for me. As far as I can tell, they’re as bad as each other and are now living entirely off their brand. We’ve got The Workers Party on the left and Reform on the right. Tories and Labour both betrayed their voters, and both lefties and righties now have options other than them. The 500 million they’d expect to take in a years Family Farm Tax would cover NHS running costs for one day.
Now watch the farmland fall into the hands of the super rich. Watch the little guy get crushed. Watch the UK lose its family based food production. Cheers Labour. I’m hoping Starmer will get a bit of pressure from within his own party. Surely there’s a few of them that think taking land from the workers and virtually placing it in the hands of the super-rich isn’t exactly consistent with their left-wing beliefs. Even if so, will any have the balls to speak out? Where’s Robin Cook when you need him?
STARMER FARMER HARMER The exhibition:

Heckel’s Horse Jr. at Starmer Farmer Harmer Exhibition:
Strawberry Cake at Starmer Farmer Harmer Exhibition:
-
Yesterday, I published the Jompiy White Paper video (above), outlining the case for Jompiy being the Bitcoin of Art. The version of the White Paper in our Stomach Turner Prize Zine includes some info on art’s Ethereum, Slumpu, but for simplicity I made the YouTube version using only the original text. The distribution of free Jompiy has moved from London’s buses and tubes, to Camden Market, to outside London’s Tate Galleries, as documented by passers by here.









The footage for the white paper video was also shot yesterday at Black Ivory Printmaking & Audio Club in Muswell Hill, London (aka my home studio).
Slumpu was created by Ron Throop, who gave a presentation to the State University of New York including the following about Jompiy:
The full video referred to in Throops presentation:









Jompiy is the Bitcoin of Art. Here’s its White Paper:
Jompiy is the Bitcoin of art. jompiy.com is its blockchain. All Jompiy are divided into series by letter. Within each series, each work is numbered, signed, front and back photographed, recorded and that ledger kept public at jompiy.com for all to see and independently store. No duplication, no opportunity for fakes. Early acquirers of Jompiy are rewarded with a relatively low number compared to latecomers. Some Jompiy paintings are given away for free at Camden Market (series G and series J) and others air dropped on London buses and tubes (series G) in political protest against our social decline.
Jompiy solves Bitcoins problems. If you buy Bitcoin and then the price drops, you lose. Like with stocks, cash, precious metals, or whatever. Every bitcoin, ounce of gold or £20 note is worth the same as any other, so early investors only win if the price goes up after they buy it and they exchange it at such a point. In Jompiy, the numbers only go up. The time to get Jompiy is always now, as numbers get higher with time, and get passively lower relative to the full edition as more are made. In Jompiy, continually increasing supply continually rewards the existing Jompiy owner. With other assets, higher quantity means less value for all. Early acquirers of Jompiy paintings are rewarded by having a low edition number.
When’s continual supply better than capped? When you do it otherwise like a limited edition and you’re holding a low number. How to make sure the early birds win? Publish them in numerical order and don’t ask them to invest anything.
It’s Jompiy’s political belief that a lack of quality original art on display in people’s homes and workplaces is contributing to a social decline.
It’s Jompiy’s political belief that taking control of art from the big galleries and super-rich and giving it directly to the people better serves society in the same way Bitcoin takes control of our money from banks and governments and gives it directly to the people too. What Bitcoin does for money, Jompiy does for art.
To my future millionaires.
Jompiy









-
Last night, Miss Libby Palmer on percussion, glockenspiel and theremin. Our first rehearsal as a three-piece.
-
New York Times sensational exposé on Heckel’s Horse:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/03/arts/design/frieze-london-billy-childish.html
On the subject of Isabella Kwai‘s New York Times article: The Artist as ‘Ever-Moving Target’: Billy Childish Refuses All Labels
These last 11 years, Billy Childish and I have been collaborating on a series of around 200 (so far) paintings, under the alias Heckel’s Horse. It’s been kept quiet till now, but things are starting to change. Still, hardly anyone knows about it. Sometimes all it takes is one word to get things going. This time it’s ‘collaborator‘, as mentioned in the New York Times article. Long gone now, are the dark old days when Edgeworth Johnstone, me!, was either too confusing or disgraceful to be publicly credited alongside Billy Childish. Even to the extent of you’d-think-credible galleries deliberately mis-selling and publicly lying about Billy and my collaborative work together WHAT A SCANDAL!!! (as discussed in my interview with Emma Pugmire, co-member of Black Ivory Printmaking & Audio Club).
That was fun! Seeing my name airbrushed from collaborative work Billy and I had done together. All because, apparently, the artworld find “Edgeworth Johnstone” not to their liking. Pure lies in the publication of work under Billy’s name must qualify as one of the CRIMES listed in the Stuckist manifesto motivated purely by financial concerns, no? (Stuckism manifesto point 19). Art college, a perfect training ground/ indoctrination camp for the artworld. Lie, be lied to, be lied about. Welcome to anti-Stuckism. Welcome to anti-punk. Welcome to anti-art. Welcome to Heckel’s Horse.
Have you bought a “by Billy Childish” from a reputable gallery or art dealer, and now you’re wondering if it was largely done by me in my Muswell Hill studio? Don’t worry. Free Jompiy are only a well-timed stroll along the South Bank away and come with blockchain level security against these types of crafty artworld shenanigans. Not only are Jompiy blockchain protected against the forgers and pinstripe suited dodgy art dealers Heckel’s Horse is up against, but they’re numbered to give early acquirers a better deal than latecomers. The early birds being largely the proletariat, the latecomers being largely the establishment. At last, some real socialism in the artworld.
It seems now though, the artworld tides might be turning a bit. I’m not, apparently, such a problem anymore that they feel they have to lie about me, to make me go away. At least, not all of the time. Maybe due to my alter-ego Jompiy‘s growing reputation and recognition for inventing The Bitcoin of Art amongst the true art elite of the South Bank, outside Tate Modern. Never mind the South Bank, how about State University of New York? Here’s my trailblazing Black Ivory colleague, Ron Throop introducing Jompiy to the top brass of US academia:
In 2010, my work was being shown by Tate inside Tate Modern, now I’m giving it away for free outside Tate Modern. Credit Isabella Kwai and The New York Times for doing more than parrot the same old Tracey Emin, punk rocker, Stuckism stories you get in most coverage of life in Billy’s Chatham painting studio. One small step for The New York Times, one giant leap for Heckel’s Horse.
The You’d-Think-Forbidden fact that Billy Childish and Edgeworth Johnstone are decade-plus long collaborators on what Billy’s publicly declared to be his “favourite work” is seeming to be less of a problem for the artworld to digest. Maybe some behind the scenes number crunching finally fell in favour of poor old Heckel’s Horse. Why such paranoia about Heckel’s Horse being allowed out in the open? I don’t know, but nothing as big as Heckel’s Horse gets such sidelining by accident.
This is the thing. How comfortably can it sit with both Billy and me, constantly self-associating with things like punk, Stuckism manifesto, and championing the amateur DIY and all that, when Heckel’s Horse still rots in Anti-Art-Establishment-Queue/Prison, largely unexhibited, unshared with the world in the true punk and Stuckist fashion the Stuckist manifesto calls for? Heckel’s Horse, patiently biding its time, for no other reason than, the hope of being launched by the mainstream conservatism the Stuckist manifesto derides the Brit Artists for kowtowing to (Stuckism manifesto point 14), in some Anti-Art Establishment Art Fair Celebrity Shit-Fest or uber-professional White-Wall-Galleryesque-Horror-Show of all the glittering prizes we, supposedly, aren’t motivated by. It’s a mass dereliction of the multiple Stuckist duties we impose on ourselves, and publicly big-loud-wallop-pat ourselves on the back for adhering to….isn’t it?
If Tate Modern came along and said they’d like to do an exhibition of Heckel’s Horse. Even if it was just the small paintings, collages and easy stuff we could exhibit ourselves, in a front room with tables, chairs and cups of tea, like the Stuckism manifesto goes on about. If Tate came along, said it would run for 6 months, big shiny catalogue, all pomp and ceremony, it would happen. It would happen if they said it needed to be ready to hang in two months. There’s no doubt in my mind, mountains would be moved to make that show happen. So it’s fair to ask: Why do glittering prizes have to be on offer if ‘enriching society by giving shared form to individual experience and an individual form to shared experience’ means anything? It’s the antithesis of Stuckism. The opposite of amateur DIY. It’s anti-punk. Not only are we failing to do what we advocate, but we’re doing exactly what we mock. At least, as far as anything we could put on ourselves. But what about a bigger show? Billy and I have done our bit:
Heckel’s Horse has produced around 200 paintings, the vast majority 6 footers on Belgian linen deep edge canvas. Heckel’s Horse, the greatest untold story of art. Never fear, Heckel’s Horse Jr.‘s here!
‘The Artist as ‘Ever-Moving Target’ is a good title for the New York Times article, as I think it contrasts quite starkly with Heckel’s Horse and gives an indication of the frustration Billy and I have felt trying to encourage along an exhibition, book, or some proportional exposure to what, we at least recognise Heckel’s Horse‘s value to be. Heckel’s Horse is an ‘Ever-Paralysed Target’, despite Billy’s in particular, efforts to get things properly moving. But we just seem to hit a brick wall every time.
Artistically, Heckel’s Horse isn’t paralysed, but we’re both Stuckist-manifesto-relater-to-ers despite Billy long since leaving the Stuckists (having STOMACHed it for as long he did), and I distance myself too from a lot of Stuckism, mainly by writing manifestos by The Other Muswell Hill Stuckists AS PER MY BOOK ON AMAZON ‘Stuckism Bitcoin Jompiy’. … The Other Muswell Hill Stuckists are, very much, not Stuckists but you have to respect the centre-corest of Stuckism’s fundamentals:
It is the Stuckist’s duty to explore his/her neurosis and innocence through the making of paintings and displaying them in public, thereby enriching society by giving shared form to individual experience and an individual form to shared experience. – Stuckism manifesto point 8.
It’s counter-Stuckist nature to see the opposite happening to Heckel’s Horse. Art’s to be shared, not locked away. Especially when it’s for business reasons, who needs the glittering prizes anyway? – Stuckism manifesto point 7. The only type of “public recognition” on offer here is that which the Stuckism manifesto point 15 attacks, not the glorious public recognition of Stuckism manifesto point 8. The current Heckel’s Horse predicament is the opposite to what I can only understand the Billy Childish & Edgeworth Johnstone & Stuckist way to be. Stuckism manifesto point 1, UNCENSORED EXPRESSION. Point 9, The Stuckist is UNAFRAID TO FAIL. Heckel’s Horse seems afraid to even move. Career artistry at its finest.
Heckel’s Horse makes Career Non-Moves.
Heckel’s Horse Jr. makes Non-Career Moves.Billy’s put it out there in at least one interview that Heckel’s Horse is his ‘favourite work’. We’ve talked about, and worked on plans to independently-ish put out a joint book and exhibition of Heckel’s Horse, I think through L-13, but those conversations started not long after the sensational Heckel’s Horse Jr. Highgate Gallery show was booked in late 2022. So, two years and counting on a publication that doesn’t even involve anyone from the white-wall anti-art gallery system throwing spanners in the works, and we still can’t get it done. At what point do you stop counting and write it off as yet another brick wall? So afraid of taking a wrong step, it seems Heckel’s Horse is incapable of taking any. Contrast this with the heroic intrepid risk taker of the Stuckism manifesto, and you can’t help questioning what the Stuckism manifesto is. From the extremes of being a clinical and transparent account of the James Bondian truth to Don Quixote doth protesting too much, to anything in between. Is the Stuckist manifesto heartfelt sincerity or just another lame tongue in cheek cop out?…..Stuckism, Fact or Fiction?
Whatever the truth of it, the leap between talking about publishing, and actually following through and doing it, seems to be getting increasingly impossible for Heckel’s Horse. What to do about it? Create Heckel’s Horse Jr. and bypass all the Heckel’s Horse bottlenecks.
I guess the necessary people are busy and/or not majorly interested in Heckel’s Horse. But Heckel’s Horse Jr.‘s here now and, crucially, I’ve got nothing better to do apart from Jompiy, Edgeworth Band‘s half-written songs and The Stomach Turner Prize 2024 demos. All systems go Heckel’s Horse Jr.!!!!
The Stuckist manifesto berates Heckel’s Horse: “Stop talking about it and just bloody do it!!! You’re surrounded by walls. Get your precious pictures up!!! What’s wrong? Not white enough for ya!!!! You’re supposed to be anti-white wall gallery system. Saving your virginity for a career as a prostitute? You talk it enough. Try walking it!” AS PER Stuckism manifesto point 18:
“The Stuckist is opposed to the sterility of the white wall gallery system and calls for exhibitions to be held in homes and musty museums, with access to sofas, tables, chairs and cups of tea. The surroundings in which art is experienced (rather than viewed) should not be artificial and vacuous.” – Stuckist manifesto point 18.
I remember back, probably 2014, some official-whatever people coming round the studio, going on about how great the Heckel’s Horse paintings are. We couldn’t have done too many by then, but it seemed they got how eager Billy and I were to get these up in a proper solo show, sometime relatively soon. But it’s like Little Britain. “Artworld says “No”. Although they don’t ever say “No”, it’s more of a grin-fuck thing (SEE THE BIT ABOUT MONOPRINTS).
It’s not the greatest, over a decade later, still essentially being in the same position, but it’s like Billy often says in the studio “If they’ve got what you want, they’ve got you.” Heckel’s Horse will have its day in the sun one day, and the longer it takes, the better for Heckel’s Horse Jr. I’ve got high hopes for Heckel’s Horse Jr. but I’ve veered off into the Jompiy thing recently so haven’t done much since the Highgate show. I moan about Heckel’s Horse but you can’t complain too much about being a prisoner if you’ve got the keys in your pocket. And how many people are going to share Billy and my rating’s of Heckel’s Horse anyway? No disrespect to the others, but you know the blonde good-looking one from “Portrait Artist of the Year”? She came round Billy’s studio to interview him for a Sky Arts documentary about Van Gogh. Like there aren’t enough documentaries about Van Gogh. I was all ready for the inevitable floods of celebrity praise when Billy showed her the Heckel’s Horse work, but she couldn’t have looked more disinterested if she’d tried. The same ‘critic’ that fawns over all that Bayswater Road crap on TV. Wouldn’t know a decent painting if it shat on her head. Maybe locking up the Heckel’s Horse painting’s got some merit to it. “None of you know what you’re looking at.” I think’s from The Rebel Billy often quotes. Anyway, Heckel’s Horse Jr. ‘s the way forward. It’s like my mum said ‘If you want something done, do it yourself.’ To me, that sums up true punk. Heckel’s Horse is demonstrably anti-punk, and will be the litmus test of Stuckism. Or, given that we’re already over a decade down the road, maybe the punk/Stuckism ships already sailed for Heckel’s Horse. The horse that never bolted. In Tracey Emin’s words “stuck, stuck, stuck“. How not Ever-Moving Target can you get? Answers below.

Billy Childish and Edgeworth Johnstone working on small Heckel’s Horse paintings. 
-
Stuckism Bitcoin Jompiy: From Charles Thomson to Billy Childish to Satoshi Nakamoto. Stuckism then Bitcoin then Jompiy. A book by Jompiy that won The Stomach Turner Prize 2024.
Look at money and high-end art now. All bought up, at least largely without regard for intrinsic value. Suffocating financial regs leaving tiny lawyer-sized gaps in money’s monopoly market art sits ideally poised to fill, almost like they knew it was coming. A bit of lip service maybe for art’s “value” but you’re still all buying lottery tickets. These suits aren’t our enemies. The supposed Enemies of Art Stuckism rallies against are amongst my finest friends and colleagues. Charity for anyone wanting to spend their days wrapped up in painting while someone else covers the rent. Time to give back. JOMPIY FOR LAWYERS. JOMPIY FOR BANKERS. Bitcoin and art don’t cut it. Stuckism didn’t turn out to be the revolution its DVD predicted. Why not? If Satoshi Nakamoto had been in on its inception, maybe things would have been different, but even Bitcoin has its problems. Jompiy’s a dirty job but someone’s got to do it.
The Other Muswell Hill Stuckists are a contemporary art movement from North London, UK. This book contains the groups revised manifestos with many early ones now abandoned for being too rubbish for publication or preservation. January 1999, Charles Thomson and Billy Childish call out the fiat art delusion, providing the world with Stuckism. A decade later, January 2009, Satoshi Nakamoto (perhaps inspired by Stuckism) calls out the fiat currency delusion by providing the world with Bitcoin. Then comes Jompiy to fix all the problems they created.
Ron Throop reads an extract on his Instagram:






















